Delhi HC defers case on constitutional validity of NAA under GST system



The on Monday deferred the hearing on a much-awaited case on the constitutional validity of Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under the goods and services tax (GST) system.


The petitions (aound 50 in number), included those by major companies such as Hindustan Unilever, Patanjali, Jubilant Foodworks, Reckitt Benckiser, Johnson & Johnson, Phillips and Subway.



The case was deferred as there was no consensus on the number of questions which needed to be heard. The court decided to hear all the questions raised. The court felt that the matter could be heard over the period of three-four weeks, said Abhishek Rastogi, counsel for many petitioners and partner at Khaitan & Co Ltd.


There were around 48 questions raised against


“While it is a good thing that the court has agreed to hear all the issues comprehensively, frankly the list could have been truncated as far as the decision is required to be taken on the constitutional aspect of the provisions,” Rastogi said.


Given the number of petitions, the court had earlier directed each petitioner to file the submissions within five pages.


In the initial round of hearing, the court said it was apparent that there was no consensus between those who had challenged the authority and the Union government with regard to the issues to be framed.


Of the 48 issues, the Union government had said only 14 of them were substantial.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor





Source link